To receive full 5 marks allocated for participation, meet the criteria A, B, and C.
A Earned more than half of weekly participation points in at least 10 weeks.
- Weekly quiz(es), if any:
- Quizzes open around the lecture time and stay open until the next lecture starts. In some weeks, there will be two quizzes (because two smaller quiz is easier for you to manage than one big quiz).
- When awarding participation points for quizzes, we look for two conditions:
- Condition 1: submitted early i.e., within four days of the lecture i.e., lecture day + three more days (reason: to encourage learning the weekly topics before doing the weekly tasks)
- Condition 2: answered correctly i.e., least 70% of the answers are correct (reason: to discourage random answers)
- You earn:
- 3 points if you satisfy both conditions.
- 2 points if only one of the conditions is satisfied.
- 1 point if submitted but both conditions are not satisfied.
- TEAMMATES peer evaluation sessions: 2 points per session
- Other weekly activities:
- There could be other activities related to the lecture, tutorial, or the administration of the module.
- Refer the activity description for evaluation criteria.
- Each activity earns 2 points unless specified otherwise.
B Received good peer evaluations
- -1 for each professional conduct criterion in which you score below average (based on the average of ratings received).
Admin Peer Evaluations → Criteria (Conduct)
- Evaluated based on the following criteria, on a scale
Poor/Below Average/Average/Good/Excellent:
Peer Evaluation Criteria: Professional Conduct
- Professional Communication :
- Communicates sufficiently and professionally. e.g. Does not use offensive language or excessive slang in project communications.
- Responds to communication from team members in a timely manner (e.g. within 24 hours).
- Punctuality: Does not cause others to waste time or slow down project progress by frequent tardiness.
- Dependability: Promises what can be done, and delivers what was promised.
- Effort: Puts in sufficient effort to, and tries their best to keep up with the module/project pace. Seeks help from others when necessary.
- Quality: Does not deliver work products that seem to be below the student's competence level i.e. tries their best to make the work product as high quality as possible within her competency level.
- Meticulousness:
- Rarely overlooks submission requirements.
- Rarely misses compulsory module activities such as pre-module survey.
- Teamwork: How willing are you to act as part of a team, contribute to team-level tasks, adhere to team decisions, etc. Honors all collectively agreed-upon commitments e.g., weekly project meetings.
- No penalty for scoring low on competency criteria.
Admin Peer Evaluations → Criteria (Competency)
- Considered only for bonus marks, A+ grades, and tutor recruitment
- Evaluated based on the following criteria, on a scale
Poor/Below Average/Average/Good/Excellent:
Peer Evaluation Criteria: Competency
- Technical Competency: Able to gain competency in all the required tools and techniques.
- Mentoring skills: Helps others when possible. Able to mentor others well.
- Communication skills: Able to communicate (written and spoken) well. Takes initiative in discussions.
C Tutorial attendance/participation not too low
Low attendance/participation can affect participation marks directly (i.e., attended fewer than 7) or indirectly (i.e., it might result in low peer evaluation ratings).
+ Bonus Marks
In addition, you can receive bonus marks in the following ways. Bonus marks can be used to top up your participation marks but only if your marks from the above falls below 5.
- [For lecture participation] Participated in lecture activities (e.g., in lecture polls/quizzes) in at least 10 lectures: 1 mark
- [For perfect peer ratings] Received good ratings for all 10 peer evaluations criteria: 1 mark
- [For helping classmates] Was very helpful to classmates e.g., multiple helpful posts in forum: 1 mark
Examples:
- Alicia earned 1/2, 3/5, 2/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 5/5, 4/5, 5/5 in the first 12 weeks. As she received at least half of the points in 11 of the weeks, she gets 5 participation marks. Bonus marks are not applicable as she has full marks already.
- Benjamin managed to get at least half of the participation points in 9 weeks only, which gives him 5-1 = 4 participation marks. But he participated in 10 lectures, and hence get a bonus mark to make it 5/5.
- Chun Ming met the participation points bar in 8 weeks only, giving him 5-2 = 3 marks. He lost 2 more marks because he received multiple negative ratings for two criteria, giving him 1/5 participation marks.
Where to find your participation marks progress
Your participation progress can be tracked in this page from week 3 onward.